Comparison between SilibaseSFT-AEO9 Nonionic Surfactant and BASF LUTENSOL A 9 N SURFACTANT
Jan 27, 2026
Good washing and wetting properties, fast dispersion speed
High biodegradability and unique foam performance
Good cleaning, heavy oil removal, dirt removal, and wax removal properties
Good compatibility, free of alkylphenol substances such as APEO
Suitable for the preparation of various household and industrial detergents
Indicator Comparison
Freezing point
SilibaseSFT-AEO9 freezing point: -6℃
BASF LUTENSOL A 9 N SURFACTANT freezing point: 22℃
Appearance (25℃)
SilibaseSFT-AEO9 Appearance at 25℃: Clear liquid
Appearance at BASF LUTENSOL A 9 N SURFACTANT 25℃: white paste
Cloud point (1% aqueous solution)
SilibaseSFT-AEO9 cloud point (1% aqueous solution): between 76.0-86.0℃
BASF LUTENSOL A 9 N SURFACTANT cloud point (1% aqueous solution): between 75.0-85.0℃
HLB
SilibaseSFT-AEO9 HLB:14.0
BASF LUTENSOL A 9 N SURFACTANT HLB:13.4
Alkali Resistance Performance
| SilibaseSFT-AEO9: | BASF LUTENSOL A 9 N SURFACTANT |
Maximum alkali resistance concentration | 65g/L NaOH solution | 65g/L NaOH solution |
Alkali resistance test method: Dissolve 1g of surfactant in 49g of a certain concentration of sodium hydroxide (10g/L or higher concentration) solution, let it sit at room temperature for 24 hours, and observe whether it floats oil, layers or floccules. Conclusion: The alkali resistance of SilibaseSFT-AEO9 is the same as that of BASF LUTENSOL A 9 N SURFACTANT
Washing Performance
| SilibaseSFT-AEO9 | BASF LUTENSOL A 9 N SURFACTANT |
Decontamination value of carbon black cloth R% | 23.88 | 23.02 |
Decontamination value of sebum cloth R% | 21.51 | 21.52 |
Test method: 30 ℃, 20min, 250ppm, 120rpm, 2g/L;
Conclusion: Regarding the washing performance of carbon black cloth, SilibaseSFT-AEO9 is slightly better than BASF LUTENSOL A 9 N SURFACTANT.
Regarding the washing performance of sebum contaminated cloth, SilibaseSFT-AEO9 is similar to BASF LUTENSOL A 9 N SURFACTANT.
Alkali resistance performance
| SilibaseSFT-AEO9 | BASF LUTENSOL A 9 N SURFACTANT |
The maximum alkali resistance concentration | 65g/L NaOH solution | 65g/L NaOH solution |
Alkali resistance test method: Dissolve 1g of surfactant in 49g of a certain concentration of sodium hydroxide (10g/L or higher concentration) solution, and leave it at room temperature for 24 hours. Observe whether it floats oil, separates into layers or forms flocculent substances. Conclusion: The alkali resistance performance of SilibaseSFT-AEO9 is the same as that of BASF LUTENSOL A 9 N SURFACTANT.
Washing performance
| SilibaseSFT-AEO9 | BASF LUTENSOL A 9 N SURFACTANT |
The decontamination value of the carbon black-soiled cloth R% | 23.88 | 23.02 |
The decontamination value of the sebum-soiled cloth R% | 21.51 | 21.52 |
Testing method:30C,20min,250ppm,120rpm,2g/L;
Conclusion: Regarding the washing performance of carbon black-stained fabric, SilibaseSFT-AEO9 is slightly better than BASF LUTENSOL A 9 N SURFACTANT. Regarding the washing performance of grease-stained fabric, SilibaseSFT-AEO9 is comparable to BASF LUTENSOL A 9 N SURFACTANT.
Emulsifying Properties
| SilibaseSFT-AEO9 | BASF LUTENSOL A 9 N SURFACTANT |
Time to separate the aqueous phase to 20 mL in the lower layer | 318.15s | 330.0s |
Appearance | | |
Test Method: Measure 35 mL of a 5 g/L surfactant solution into a beaker using a graduated cylinder, and add 35 mL of soybean oil to the beaker. Stir at 1000 rpm for 90 seconds, then stop stirring and pour the mixture into a 100 mL stoppered centrifuge tube. Observe the oil-water phase separation. Record the separation time when the aqueous phase reaches 20 mL. Conclusion: SilibaseSFT-AEO9 exhibits slightly better emulsifying properties than BASF LUTENSOL A 9 N SURFACTANT. |
Gel Range
Moisture content (%) | | SilibaseSFT-AEO9 | BASF LUTENSOL A 9 N SURFACTANT |
| 10 | Transparent liquid | Transparent liquid |
| 20 | Transparent liquid | Gel |
| 30 | Gel | Gel |
| 40 | Gel | Gel |
| 50 | Transparent liquid | Gel |
| 60 | Transparent liquid | Gel |
| 70 | Transparent liquid | Transparent liquid |
| 80 | Transparent liquid | Transparent liquid |
| 90 | Transparent liquid | Transparent liquid |
Conclusion: The gel range of SilibaseSFT-AEO9 is narrower than that of BASF LUTENSOL A 9 N SURFACTANT. |
Bubble test
| SilibaseSFT-AEO9 | BASF LUTENSOL A 9 N SURFACTANT |
0min | 100.0mL | 99.7mL |
1min | 98.0mL | 98.7mL |
3min | 83.3mL | 94.3mL |
5min | 63.3mL | 86.7mL |
Test conditions (in accordance with GB/T7462-1994): 1.0g/L, deionized water, 25°C. Conclusion: The foam of SilibaseSFT-AEO9 decreases faster than that of BASF LUTENSOL A 9 N SURFACTANT.
Wetting performance
| SilibaseSFT-AEO9 | BASF LUTENSOL A 9 N SURFACTANT |
0.15 grams per liter (in water) | 32.5s | 49.9s |
0.5 grams per liter (in water) | 26.46s | 41.58s |
1 grams per liter (in water) | 16.63s | 18.76s |
Test method: Cotton fabric sheet, 25°C, water, 1% NaOH solution. Conclusion: The wetting property of SilibaseSFT-AEO9 is better than that of BASF LUTENSOL A 9 N SURFACTANT.